Back

Interactions between inbreeding, fitness and the bacterial microbiome in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes

Ross, P. A.; de Jonge, N.; Yang, Q.; Paris, V.; Kristensen, T. N.; Hoffmann, A. A.

2026-03-14 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.14.711767 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Laboratory and field populations of insects can experience a decline in fitness and loss of genetic diversity due to inbreeding depression and genetic drift, respectively. Matings among related individuals and small population size may also influence insect host microbiomes with consequences for fitness. In the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti, the bacterial microbiome is largely environmentally determined but recent studies have also revealed host genetic components. We generated a panel of 55 inbred lines from either of two founding outbred populations of Ae. aegypti to test for associations between life history traits, inbreeding, allelic diversity and microbiome composition using ddRADseq and bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing on pools of mosquitoes. Effects of inbreeding were diverse with severe composite fitness costs in many lines but minimal costs in others despite similar low levels of genetic diversity. We found no strong relationship between major life history traits across inbred lines, suggesting that any costs due to inbreeding were trait specific. Bacterial microbiome analysis of pooled samples from a subset of populations revealed common microbes across populations, with Elizabethkingia, Aeromonas and Ralstonia being the most abundant. Despite bacterial composition varying widely, there was no clear relationship between microbiome composition and fitness or population origin. However, there were several significant positive correlations between the relative abundance of different microbial taxa across lines. Our results demonstrate diverse impacts of inbreeding on fitness of mosquito populations but with limited impacts on the microbiome.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.2%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
5
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
8
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
12
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
17
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
21
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%