Back

FLIM-FRET as a Molecular Filter for Membrane-Induced Aggregation

Salem, A.; Qi, W.; Rochet, J.-C.; Webb, K. J.

2026-03-15 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.14.711702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Membrane binding is thought to trigger early aggregation of alpha-synuclein (aSyn) in neurons. However, live-cell measurements of membrane-proximal aggregation with high specificity remain challenging. We combine three- channel fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) with Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) in a model that uses FRET as a proximity filter. A membrane-tethered donor reports membrane-aSyn separation through lifetime changes, while an aSyn-labeled acceptor reports the aggregation state through its lifetime. We estimate per-cell lifetimes and mixture fractions for membrane-bound and membrane-unbound populations using a hierarchical expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm that pools information across pixels. We validate the estimator using Monte Carlo studies. Using experimental neuronal data, this method resolves changes in membrane-proximal aggregation and aggregate-associated lifetimes. This framework provides quantitative per-cell metrics linking membrane proximity and aggregation for comparative live-cell studies. SIGNIFICANCEMany studies map FRET signals pixel by pixel or average signals over whole cells. Neither approach reliably answers key biological questions: how much membrane-proximal aggregation exists in a given cell, and how does it change across conditions? Here, we combine three-channel FLIM-FRET with a hierarchical analysis that estimates per-cell lifetimes and fractions for bound and unbound populations by pooling information across pixels. This method shifts the focus from noisy images to cell-level metrics that support comparisons across treatments, time points, or genotypes. Simulations and neuronal data show improved accuracy under realistic photon budgets and reveal membrane-proximal aggregation effects that were unattainable otherwise. This approach is broadly applicable and extends beyond alpha-synuclein.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
11
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
16
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
22
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
26
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
27
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%