Back

BioOS: A Gene-Driven Digital Twin Runtime for Emergent Plant Development

AUGER, E.; Gandecki, M.; Delarche, C.; Heng, F. X.

2026-03-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.14.711542 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting plant mutant phenotypes requires models that connect gene regulation to organ-scale morphogenesis without collapsing mechanism into phenomenological rules. We present BioOS, a curated mechanistic runtime built around the Formal Cell, a minimal signal-processing abstraction in which promoter evaluation, transcription, translation, and protein state drive cell division, differentiation, and elongation. A multi-scale architecture combining TissueUnits and FormalCells enables real-time simulation of bounded Arabidopsis thaliana developmental programs while keeping the primary claim anchored in primary-root auxin transport. On the official five-case root-auxin benchmark, BioOS achieves a 75.4% mean score, 5/5 qualitative matches, 5/5 quantitative passes, and Spearman severity correlation {rho} = 0.70. The deployed auxin slice uses a curated 35-gene registry; for readability, this manuscript details an 18-gene core subnetwork. Beyond the primary auxin claim, the same runtime closes official cytokinin (5/5), flowering (5/5), and photosynthesis (7/7) gates, while a candidate root-patterning panel passes 8/8. BioOS should therefore be read as a benchmark-validated runtime for bounded developmental prediction rather than as a single-slice demonstration. O_TEXTBOXKey Resulty ResultsThe following results summarize the current validation status of BioOS on the primary-root auxin slice and its surrounding benchmark framework: O_LI35-gene root-auxin runtime, with an 18-gene core GRN illustrated here C_LIO_LIEmergent division, differentiation, elongation from gene expression C_LIO_LIOfficial auxin panel closed: 5/5 qualitative matches, 5/5 full passes, 75.4% mean score, {rho} = 0.70 severity ranking C_LIO_LIFour official gates closed in one runtime: root_auxin 5/5, cytokinin 5/5, flowering 5/5, photosyn-thesis 7/7 C_LIO_LIBroader benchmark corpus: 6 suites / 63 cases; the 8-case candidate root-patterning panel currently passes 8/8 C_LIO_LIReal-time capable: 175 TissueUnits + 200 cells = 8 ms/tick C_LI C_TEXTBOX

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.1%
2
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
6
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
12
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
14
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
17
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%