A Machine Learning Framework for Constructing Heterogeneous Contact Networks: Implications for Epidemic Modelling
Murray Kearney, L.; Davis, E. L.; Keeling, M. J.
Show abstract
Capturing the structured mixing within a population is key to the reliable projection of infectious disease dynamics and hence informed control. Both heterogeneity in the number of epidemiologically-relevant contacts and age-structured mixing have been repeatedly demonstrated as fundamental, yet are rarely combined. Networks provide a powerful and intuitive method to realise these two elements of population structure, and simulate infection dynamics. While there are a few key examples of contact networks being measured explicitly, this is not scalable to larger populations, where representative networks must be constructed from more ubiquitous individual-level data. Here, using data from social contact surveys, we develop a generalisable and robust algorithm utilizing machine learning to generate a surrogate population-scale network that preserves both age-structured mixing and heterogeneity of contacts. For different datasets and network construction assumptions we simulate the spread of infection, considering how the epidemic size varies over basic reproduction number (R0) scenarios - mirroring the process of determining public health impact from early epidemic growth. Our approach shows that both age structure and degree heterogeneity substantially reduce the epidemic size (for a given R0) compared to simpler models. We also demonstrate that these simulations more accurately re-capture the heterogeneity in secondary cases that has been observed, when transmission is scaled by contact duration to dampen the effect of highly connected nodes ("super-spreaders"). By using survey data collected during 2020-2022, these network models also inform about the impacts of control and targeting of public health interventions: quantifying the non-linear reduction in transmission opportunities that occurred during lockdowns, and the ages and contact types most responsible for onward transmission. Our robust methodology therefore allows for the inclusion of the full wealth of data commonly collected by surveys but frequently overlooked to be incorporated into more realistic transmission models of infectious diseases.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-Scale Measurement of Aggregate Human Colocation Patterns for Epidemiological Modeling 96%
- Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 in British Columbia: an age-structured model with time-dependent contact rates 95%
- Limited impact of contact tracing in a University setting for COVID-19 due to asymptomatic transmission and social distancing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disease-economy trade-offs under alternative pandemic control strategies 95%
- Estimating the effect of social inequalities in the mitigation of COVID-19 across communities in Santiago de Chile 95%
- The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19: an individual-based modelling study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Household bubbles and COVID-19 transmission: insights from percolation theory 94%
- Developmental synchrony and extraordinary multiplication rates in pathogenic organisms 93%
- The Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of cases due to gatherings and groups with relevance to COVID-19 mitigation strategies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.