Back

Ollivier Ricci Curvature as a Geometric Biomarker for Biomedical Networks: From Ontology to Comorbidity Aging Trajectories

Agourakis, D. C.; Gerenutti, M.

2026-03-16 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.14.26348393 medRxiv
Show abstract

Network geometry offers a principled lens for understanding the structure of biomedical knowledge. We apply exact Ollivier-- Ricci curvature (ORC) -- a discrete analogue of Riemannian curvature computed via optimal transport -- to medical ontologies, disease comorbidity networks, biological interaction networks, and brain functional connectivity graphs. Three main results emerge. First, within a single database (the Human Phenotype Ontology), the formal IS-A taxonomy is hyperbolic ([Formula], tree-like), while the disease co-occurrence network is spherical ([Formula], clique-rich) -- a six-order-of-magnitude gap in the density parameter that the curvature phase transition framework predicts without free parameters. Second, age-stratified disease comorbidity networks from 8.9 million Austrian hospital patients reveal a geometric aging trajectory: mean ORC increases monotonically from [Formula] (age 20-30) to [Formula] (age 80+), driven by rising clustering and density that encode the accumulation of multimorbidity. Third, sedenion ([R]16) Mandel-brot orbit features -- exploiting the zero-divisor structure of the Cayley-Dickson tower -- discriminate ASD-like from ADHD-like brain network topology (AUROC = 0.990, sedenion-only), providing complementary geometric information to ORC. Canonical biological networks (C. elegans neural, E. coli gene regulatory, protein-protein interaction) are uniformly spherical, suggesting that evolved biological networks universally favour redundant, triangle-rich connectivity. All core mathematical claims are machine-verified in Lean 4 (0 sorry in 7 core modules). These results establish ORC as a quantitative geometric biomarker for biomedical network analysis and demonstrate that the same phase transition framework governing semantic networks extends to clinical and biological domains.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
5
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
12
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
14
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%