Back

A Retrospective Multi-Source Clinical Validation of Lenek Intelligent Radiology Assistant: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Chest Radiograph Screening and Triage System for High-Burden Pulmonary and Cardiac Conditions in India

Singh, V.; Jhamb, A.; Sil, S.; Kumar, S.; Agrawal, C.; Pareek, A.; Gautam, A.; Parale, G.; Singh, S.; Padmanabhan, D.

2026-03-16 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.14.26348373 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundA critical radiologist shortage exists in India, leading to delayed chest radiograph (CXR) interpretation. This leads to disease progression, higher morbidity, and mortality. Artificial intelligence-based CXR interpretation by Lenek Intelligent Radiology Assistant (LIRA) is a promising solution. This study aims to establish the screening and triaging capabilities of LIRA by assessing its accuracy in detecting abnormalities and pathologies in CXRs from geographically diverse institutions. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multi-source validation of the diagnostic accuracy of LIRA for the detection of general abnormalities, tuberculosis, consolidation, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and cardiomegaly. De-identified chest radiographs were input into LIRA models. The obtained interpretations were compared to the established ground truth reporting for the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC with 95% CI for individual pathologies across varying probability thresholds. ResultsLIRA demonstrated high sensitivity for general abnormality detection (AUROC 0.93-0.986, 84.4-97.1% sensitivity, 88.9-92.4% specificity) and tuberculosis triaging (Shenzhen & Montgomery: 88.5-89.7% sensitivity, 89.9-90.5% specificity; Jaypee: 98.7% sensitivity, 63.6% specificity). For consolidation (AUROC 0.884-0.895, 96.4-96.9% sensitivity, 70.8-77.1% specificity), pleural effusion (AUROC 0.942-0.967, 79.7-99.1% sensitivity, 81.2-87.7% specificity), pneumothorax (AUROC 0.87, 90.6-94.8% sensitivity, 79.5-82.7% specificity) and cardiomegaly (AUROC 0.883, 95.1% sensitivity, 81.6% specificity), the model exhibited commendable accuracy as well. ConclusionsThe diagnostic performance of LIRA was consistent across various pathologies and chest radiographs from diverse geographic locations, with particular strengths in abnormality detection and tuberculosis screening. The risk-stratified triaging and high sensitivity of LIRA make it a reliable adjunct solution to address radiologist shortages, reduce turnaround times, and support Indias tuberculosis elimination goals.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
4
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
6
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%