Back

Incorporating Uncertainty in Study Participants' Age in Serocatalytic Models

Chen, J.; Lambe, T.; Kamau, E.; Donnelly, C.; Lambert, B.; Bajaj, S.

2026-03-16 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.14.26346885 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSerological surveys measure the presence of antibodies in a population to infer past exposure to an infectious pathogen. If study participants ages are known, serocatalytic models can be used to retrace the historical transmission strength of a pathogen within that population, quantified by the force of infection (FOI). These models rely on age information as a key variable since infection risks are interpreted in relation to how long individuals have been at risk. However, due to data constraints, participants ages may be provided only within "age bins". A common approach is then to assign individuals ages to be midpoints of their respective age bins, ignoring uncertainty in this quantity. In this study, we quantify the bias introduced by this midpoint approach and develop a Bayesian framework that explicitly accounts for uncertainty in age. By comparing inference under constant, age-dependent, and time-dependent FOI scenarios, we show that incorporating uncertainty in age in serocatalytic models yields more reliable FOI estimates without sacrificing computational complexity. These improvements support the interpretation of serological data and inform public health decisions, such as estimating disease burden and identifying targeted vaccination groups.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.6%
2
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
3
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
10
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
11
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
16
Biostatistics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
17
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
21
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%