Deep-learning-assisted simulation of a cortical circuit: integrating anatomy, physiology and function
Ito, S.; Haufler, D.; Fraile, J. G.; Dai, K.; Aman, J.; Chen, G.; Mirasso, C. R.; Maass, W.; Arkhipov, A.
Show abstract
Mechanistic understanding of the brain requires models constrained by anatomy, physiology, and functional activity. We present a differentiable simulator and a [~]67,000-neuron model of mouse primary visual cortex that integrates multimodal data, including electron-microscopy connectomics, multipatch synaptic physiology, cell-type-resolved electrophysiology, and large-scale Neuropixels recordings across diverse cell types. End-to-end training completes on a single GPU in [~]10 hours while preserving biological constraints. Networks trained only on brief drifting-grating responses reproduce cell-type-specific benchmarks and generalize to new contrasts and natural scenes. We uncover heterogeneous cell-type- and tuning-dependent synaptic organization and show that training preferentially sculpts inhibitory connectivity into distinct cohorts with strong causal influence on network activity. Targeted ablations show that removing biological priors on synaptic weight distributions can preserve functional activity yet disrupts emergent wiring rules. Our freely shared models and code facilitate differentiable simulations as a computationally practical framework for studying brain circuit function and mechanisms under biological constraints.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A cortical circuit mechanism for coding and updating task structural knowledge in inference-based decision-making 98%
- A neural circuit framework for economic choice: from building blocks of valuation to compositionality in multitasking 98%
- Universal statistics of hippocampal place fields across species and dimensionalities 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.