Back

RIBEX: Predicting and Explaining RNA Binding Across Structured and Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDR)-rich Proteins

Firmani, S.; Steinbauer, F.; Kasneci, G.; Horlacher, M.; Marsico, A.

2026-03-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.13.711639 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate post-transcriptional processes, yet many remain undiscovered because RNA-binding activity often occurs outside canonical RNA-binding domains (RBDs), including within intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) or through protein complexes. Computational methods can help identify novel RBPs, but approaches relying solely on sequence-derived features or ignoring the cellular interaction context are limited in capturing the complexity of RNA-binding behavior. To date, no framework rigorously integrates both sequence information and protein interaction context for RBP prediction. ResultsWe introduce RIBEX, a multimodal framework that combines protein language model (pLM) embeddings with protein interactome topology to improve RBP prediction and interpretation. Specifically, we integrate sequence representations with graph-derived positional encodings (PE) from the human STRING protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. PE are computed using Personalized PageRank, reduced with principal component analysis, and fused with pooled sequence embeddings through FiLM conditioning, while Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enables parameter-efficient task adaptation. Across both an annotation-based benchmark and experimental RNA Interactome Capture (RIC) dataset, PE consistently improves predictive performance, indicating that interactome topology provides complementary information beyond sequence features. LoRA adaptation of ESM2-650M further yields larger gains than simply scaling frozen backbone size. RIBEX outperforms state-of-the-art methods such as RBP-TSTL and HydRA, particularly on challenging subsets including proteins lacking canonical RBDs and those enriched in IDRs. For interpretability, we combine sequence-level computational alanine scanning with network-level positional-encoding ablation and inverse-PCA mapping, recovering known RNA-binding domains, IDR-associated contributions, and functional interactome communities linked to RBP predictions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.