Back

A biosecurity baseline for transboundary management of marine biological invasions in the ROPME Sea Area

Vilizzi, L.; Abbas, A. M.; Mubarak, M. A.; Alavi, M. H.; Shojaei, M.; Moghaddas, D.; Rahmani, H.; Albu Salih, A. A. R.; Al-Khayyat, M. F. A.; Al-Faisal, A. J.; Al-Marhoun, A. F.; Abdulhussain, A. H.; Alkhamees, J.; Karam, Q. E.; Behbehani, W.; Al Rezaiqi, M.; Al Tarshi, M.; Salman, S. F.; Al Jamaei, A. M.; El Mahdi, M. E. A.; Mohamed, A. A.; Sabbagh, E. I.; Mehzoud, N.; Al Shamsi, O. A. H.; Al-Wazzan, Z.

2026-03-17 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.13.711635 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Marine and brackish-water ecosystems are increasingly degraded by cumulative human pressures, with biological invasions representing a major driver of biodiversity loss, ecosystem disruption, and socio-economic impacts. Effective management requires regionally harmonized and scientifically robust baselines capable of supporting coordinated transboundary decision-making. Here we present the first consolidated marine biosecurity baseline for the Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME) Sea Area, a transboundary region characterized by extreme environmental conditions and increasing biosecurity pressure. A total of 192 species (123 extant and 69 horizon), including birds, fishes, tunicates, invertebrates, plants, and chromists, were systematically reviewed, taxonomically validated, and cross-checked against major databases and Member State inputs. Re-evaluation of a previous regional screening revealed substantial inconsistencies, with 24 species ({approx}18%) requiring status correction or exclusion. The resulting consolidated inventory comprised 130 validated retained species supplemented by 62 additional taxa. Extant species were classified according to biogeographic origin and impact status, whereas horizon species were evaluated based on introduction pathways, environmental suitability, and projected climate trends. Risk screening under current and projected climate conditions identified 39 extant species as very high risk, providing an operational basis for progression to full risk assessment and coordinated regional biosecurity management.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
26
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%