Back

Single-library chromosome-scale diploid assemblies of vole genomes resolve a species-specific duplication implicated in pair bonding

Abuelanin, M.; Kaya, G.; Lake, J. A.; Lambert, C.; Wu, M. V.; Berendzen, K.; Krasheninnikova, K.; Wood, J. M.; Solomon, N. G.; Donaldson, Z. R.; Bales, K. L.; Howe, K.; Korlach, J.; Manoli, D. S.; Tollkuhn, J.; Dennis, M. Y.

2026-03-17 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.13.711624 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-quality reference genomes are essential to effectively characterize genomic drivers of speciation, phenotypic diversity, and disease causality. Larger complex genomes often require integration of long-read DNA sequencing with additional genomic data, such as chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C or CiFi) to generate phased chromosome-scale assemblies, however this requires multiple sequencing platforms (in the case of Hi-C) or the construction of multiple long-read sequencing libraries. Here, we devise a strategy that combines PacBio HiFi and CiFi sequencing in a single library and run to efficiently produce high-quality contiguous chromosome-scale diploid genome assemblies. We apply this approach to liver tissue from single individuals of prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), generating haplotype-resolved, chromosome-scale 2.3 Gbp genomes with QV~62, and 99.3% BUSCO completeness. Comparing the two new genomes identifies complex structural changes impacting Avpr1a, previously implicated in pair bonding, including a species-specific duplication missing from the existing prairie vole reference genome. These divergent genomic features offer new avenues of investigation related to behavioral divergence between prairie and meadow voles. This single-library approach facilitates a simplified and more affordable assembly workflow, producing near-complete genomes of diverse species using one sequencing platform.

Published in Cell Genomics (predicted rank #27) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.