Back

Chronoecological interactions: Temporal niche-switching by black-striped mice after agonistic food competition with a dominant sympatric mouse species

Stryjek, R.; d'Isa, R.; Parsons, M. H.; Szymanska, K.; Socha, K.; Chrzanowski, M.; Kurek, K.; Bebas, P.

2026-03-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.13.711595 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When novel nutrient-rich food sources become available to species sharing the same natural habitat, interspecies competition may arise, yielding insights into the ecological and social dynamics of the observed species. Here, we investigated food consumption patterns, and consequent social interactions, by two sympatric species of mice in response to a novel nutrient-rich food source. By deploying, in the mices natural habitat, baited video-monitored chambers, we collected, over a 5-month period, 1805 observations of food visiting by Apodemus agrarius and Apodemus flavicollis. We also documented interspecific encounters, with 86.7% of the cases showing agonism. In these interspecies agonistic encounters, A. flavicollis was always the initiator of agonism, attacking within 2 sec in 92.3% of the cases, and being dominant over A. agrarius in 84.6%. Analysis of food visiting behavior revealed that, initially, both species preferred nocturnality. However, after the interspecies fights, A. agrarius switched its temporal preference to diurnality, leading to temporal niche segregation between the two species and a significant reduction of interspecies encounters. Moreover, A. agrarius demonstrated hour-specific avoidance of A. flavicollis, visiting significantly less in hours with A. flavicollis compared to hours without. Through temporal niche switching, A. agrarius managed to access the food source safely, without fights. In contrast, A. flavicollis remained consistently nocturnal across the entire study. Notably, our study presents the first 24h foraging actogram for free-living rodents. Moreover, while rodent interspecific competition is a well-known phenomenon, most of what we know about it comes from indirect observations. Direct observations of rodent interspecific interactions in nature are rare. Our work is the first direct (video-monitored) observation of temporal switch-inducing interspecies interactions in nature. As free-living rodents are currently considered a major model system for the study of interspecific competition, these results may offer precious insights for a better understanding of social dynamics, especially in asymmetric relationships. Furthermore, our findings highlight the significance of considering temporal dynamics in studies of interspecific interactions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
2
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
13
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
14
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
19
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
24
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
26
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%