Back

Reliable quantification of multiplexed genetically encoded biosensors responsiveness in plant tissues

Levak, V.; Zupanic, A.; Pogacar, K.; Marondini, N.; Stare, K.; Arnsek, T.; Fink, K.; Gruden, K.; Lukan, T.

2026-03-16 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.13.711581 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetically encoded biosensors are one of essential tools in biological research. They enable visualization of molecules of interest from the subcellular level to entire organism level in vivo and can be used to monitor presence of small molecules, gene expression, protein activity, and protein degradation. However, multiplexing fluorescent biosensors in plants is notoriously difficult due to signal bleed-through and strong autofluorescence from chlorophyll. In this study, we investigated the potential of multiplexing biosensors based on the selection of reporter fluorescent proteins. We characterized the emission spectra, fluorescence lifetimes, and relative brightness of diverse fluorescent proteins in plant leaves. We show that selected proteins exhibit comparable brightness, supporting their use in co-expression experiments and reliable quantification of individual signals. To separate overlapping signals, we applied two different linear unmixing approaches and compared them to results obtained without unmixing. We identified channel separation unmixing approach as the most suitable for biosensors. Additionally, we show how unmixing with the selected approach can be applied to separate autofluorescence and we validated this approach in virus-infected cells by following organelle dynamics in vivo. Overall, our work demonstrates that biosensors can be multiplexed, even when their emission spectra overlap. Significance statementMultiplexing genetically encoded biosensors in plants has been limited by overlapping fluorescent signals and strong autofluorescence. This study presents an optimized framework for linear unmixing and provides a MATLAB-based organelle segmentation tool, allowing precise quantification of multiple fluorescent reporters in vivo and advancing real-time visualization of complex cellular processes in plants.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
13.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
3
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
9
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
10
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
13
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
22
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%