Back

Molecular determinants underlying substrate receptor specificity of human CRL4B E3 ubiquitin ligase

Mohamed, W. I.; Rabl, J.; Qureshi, B. M.; Leitner, A.; Uliana, F.; Kazemzadeh, A.; Radwan, N.; Peter, M.

2026-03-15 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.03.13.711546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The vertebrate CRL4 family of Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases is distinguished from other cullin-based ligases by the presence of two highly homologous paralogs, CUL4A and CUL4B. Both CRL4 complexes use the DDB1 subunit to recruit dedicated and interchangeable substrate receptors called DCAFs, but the underlying mechanisms guiding DCAF specificity for CUL4B or CUL4A remain poorly understood. Here, we performed structural and biochemical analyses of the CRL4BLIS1 complex and identified two molecular determinants for CUL4B-specific DCAFs. First, we discovered that the unique CUL4B N-terminal extension directly binds CUL4B-specific DCAFs, enhancing their complex formation. This direct interaction can be modulated by phosphorylation, adding the possibility for spatiotemporal regulation. Second, the cryo-EM model of the CRL4BLIS1 complex identified a novel interface on the DDB1 subunit which promotes LIS1 recruitment. Quantitative affinity measurements and mutational analysis confirmed that this DDB1 interface is generally important for recruiting CUL4B-specific DCAFs including WDR1 and BRWD1, but not for CUL4A-specifc DCAFs, such as DCAF8. Together, our study identifies molecular determinants and unexpected interfaces on CRL4 components that dictate preference for DCAF recruitment. Graphical Abstract showing how the two CRL4 complexe s, namely CRL4A and CRL4B, recruit their DCAFs O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=186 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/711546v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1000"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c376c7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ab41c8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16bcd82org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8124ff_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.