Back

Ancient metapopulations and extreme sex-biased demography revealed by ABC inference and X-Chromosome diversity in Indo-Pacific reef sharks

Dahms, C.; Momigliano, P.

2026-03-13 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.13.711537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reconstructing demographic histories in marine species is challenged by extensive geographic distributions, dispersal barriers, high site fidelity, and sex-biased movement. The grey reef shark Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos exemplifies these difficulties: despite limited long-distance dispersal, its Indo-Pacific range spans major oceanographic barriers, leading to competing hypotheses of continuous isolation-by-distance versus hierarchical metapopulation structure. We test these alternatives with a new Approximate Bayesian Computation framework and integrate sex chromosome diversity and differentiation analyses. We find strong support for two ancient, deeply separated Indo-Pacific metapopulations that only recently experienced limited secondary contact. X-chromosome diversity shows extreme reductions relative to autosomes (Q{pi}{approx} 0.18-0.30 in the central/western Indian Ocean and 0.37-0.46 elsewhere), and QFST estimates far below neutral expectations of 0.75. This signature is markedly stronger than in some other carcharhinids and consistent with a reduced effective size of the X chromosome under strong sex-biased dispersal, likely amplified during sequential colonisation events during the last range expansion. Combined evidence of ancient divergence, reduced genetic diversity and extreme depletion of X chromosome diversity supports designating the Western and Central Indian Ocean populations as Evolutionary Significant Units. Our results demonstrate how integrating simulation-based inference with chromosome-specific diversity resolves complex metapopulation histories and reveal how sex-biased dispersal shapes genomic diversity across evolutionary timescales.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.