Trait misalignment risk in North American forests under climate change

Climate change is expected to alter forest community composition and functioning, with consequences for the ecosystem services forests provide. However, most macroecological projections focus on individual species distributions and offer limited insight into whether entire communities will remain functionally compatible with future climatic conditions. Here we quantify the risk that present-day forest communities will become functionally misaligned with projected climates using a trait-based approach. We analysed forest inventory data from more than 42,000 mature plots across the United States and Canada. For each plot we estimated community-weighted means for 24 functional traits describing leaf economics, hydraulic function, wood structure, abiotic tolerances and symbiotic strategies. We modelled relationships between community functional composition and environmental conditions, and used these relationships to estimate the trait profiles most compatible with projected late-century climates (2080-2100). Trait-environment misalignment (TEM) risk was quantified as the multivariate distance between current community trait composition and the trait profile associated with the projected future climate at each location, accounting for covariance among traits and intraspecific trait variation. Projected climatic conditions favour trait combinations associated with greater hydraulic capacity and reduced cold and shade tolerance. However, the magnitude of functional misalignment varies strongly across space. The highest TEM risk occurs in high-latitude and montane conifer forests across western and central North America, whereas many mid-latitude broadleaf and mixed forests show lower risk because projected climatic changes reinforce existing drought-adapted functional strategies. Critically, high species richness was the strongest predictor of reduced risk, reinforcing the importance of biodiversity in buffering against adverse outcomes. Our results suggest that many forests are projected to experience climatic conditions associated with functional strategies that differ from those characterising the current community. By identifying where the largest functional adjustments are implied, this trait-based framework provides a scalable way to pinpoint forests most likely to experience suboptimal climate conditions and to prioritise monitoring and climate-adapted management.