Back

When South meets North: a joint contact zone coinciding with environmental gradients in three boreal tree species

Herrera Egoavil, P.; Leal, J. L.; Zhou, Q.; Milesi, P.; Lascoux, M.; Yildirim, B.

2026-03-17 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.13.711305 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-glacial recolonization of Fennoscandia created secondary contact zones in many species, offering opportunities to study how gene flow and selection contribute to their establishment and maintenance. Here, we analyse genomic data from three boreal tree species--Picea abies, Betula pendula, and Pinus sylvestris--sampled along a latitudinal gradient in Sweden. Despite differences in colonization timing and dispersal ecology, all three species exhibit north-south genetic structuring aligned with environmental gradients. Most notably, the two main genetic clusters within each species overlap in a shared contact zone, corresponding to the climatic transition between Swedens two major environmental zones. The extent and structure of the contact zone differ among species: P. abies shows stronger genetic structure and moderate gene flow, B. pendula exhibits intermediate differentiation and gene flow, and P. sylvestris displays the weakest structure with stronger gene flow. All three species also show genomic signatures of local adaptation, with distinct underlying architectures. In P. abies, adaptive loci are broadly distributed across the genome, while, strikingly, they are mostly found within an inversion on chromosome 1 in B. pendula. In P. sylvestris, local adaptation likely relies on subtle allele frequency shifts across many loci with weak signals. These patterns align with theoretical expectations for polygenic local adaptation under varying migration regimes. Our comparative approach demonstrates how gene flow and selection jointly shape genomic landscapes in shared environments and contributes to understanding local adaptation in forest trees, with implications for predicting species responses to climate change.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%