Back

Using insertable cardiac monitors to test determinants of heart rate and activity in captive baboons

Andreadis, C. R.; Kulahci, I. G.; Ndung'u, J.; Kigen, D.; Kimiti, P.; Mugambi Kibe, K.; Laske, N. R.; Mwadime, J.; Wanjala, N.; Pontzer, H.; Laske, T. G.; Akinyi, M. Y.; Archie, E. A.

2026-03-17 zoology
10.64898/2026.03.13.710869 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInsertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide fine-grained, continuous data on cardiac activity. These data have great potential to reveal individual physiology, energetics, and stress responses, with implications for animal health, cognition, welfare, and conservation. However, these devices must be tested for safety, accuracy, and biological validity before being deployed in new species. Here we do so for the Reveal LINQTM ICM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN USA) over an 8-month period in 10 adult female baboons (Papio anubis and P. cynocephalus) at the Kenya Institute of Primate Research in Kenya. We also report data on heart rate, physical activity, and body temperature in unrestrained, conscious, captive baboons during their normal activities. Finally, we test how heart rate and activity levels are predicted by baboon species, body mass index, time of day, ambient temperature, social dominance rank, and ovarian cycle phase. ResultsThe baboons had no adverse reactions to the Reveal LINQTM ICM. Their mean daytime heart rates (HRs) over 2-minute intervals ranged from 89.7 to 128.0 beats per minute (bpm), and their resting HRs ranged from 74.7 to 103.0 bpm. The fastest observed R-wave interval validated by electrocardiogram (ECG) was 230 milliseconds (ms) (260 bpm), and the slowest was 1270 ms (47.4 bpm). In terms of predictors of HR and activity, HR was highly individualized, while activity level was not: baboon identity explained 40% of the variation in HR, but identity only 1% of variation in activity levels. HR was positively correlated with physical activity and HR was highest during daylight hours when the baboons were more active. Dominant baboons had higher HRs controlling for activity and were more active than low ranking individuals. In terms of ovarian cycle phase, HR was higher when individuals were in the periovulatory and luteal phases of the ovarian cycle compared to the follicular phase. ConclusionsOur findings support the future use of ICMs to investigate physiological responses in baboons. These devices safety and validity represent the plausibility of understanding inter-individual and inter-species variation in heart rate and activity in response to variation in the external environment and in individual internal state.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.8%
4
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
7
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
8
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
25
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%