Back

ApoFLARE: a luminescent reporter for direct quantification of APOBEC3A editing activity

Di Marco, M. V.; Butler, B. L.; Eggers, C. T.; Hata, A. N.

2026-03-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.13.710312 bioRxiv
Show abstract

APOBEC-mediated cytidine deamination is a major endogenous source of mutagenesis in human cancers and has been linked to tumor evolution, clonal diversification and therapeutic resistance. Among the APOBEC family, APOBEC3A (A3A) is a potent and inducible cytidine deaminase, with dynamic and context-dependent activation. Most approaches for studying the role of A3A in cancer infer A3A activity indirectly via its expression level or retrospective mutational signatures, or through molecular assays that are limited to endpoint measurements and do not readily allow longitudinal interrogation of A3A editing dynamics. Therefore, quantifying the timing, persistence, and cellular heterogeneity of A3A activity remains challenging. Here, we describe ApoFLARE, a genetically encoded reporter that converts A3A-mediated cytidine deamination into a quantitative luminescent signal in living cells. ApoFLARE allows for scalable, ratiometric measurement of editing activity and enables time-resolved analysis of editing kinetics. Reporter activation is selectively dependent on A3A catalytic function and was absent in A3A-deficient, but not A3B-deficient cells. Under stress and targeted therapy conditions, reporter activity correlated with endogenous RNA editing measured by digital droplet PCR, including contexts in which catalytic activity persisted beyond transient A3A transcript induction. Thus, ApoFLARE offers a scalable platform to investigate the regulation, kinetics, and heterogeneity of A3A editing. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=154 SRC="FIGDIR/small/710312v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19497aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@71866borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12ffbdaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13fd501_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.3%
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
9
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
11
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.7%
27
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%