Back

Heterogenous treatment effects of blood transfusion in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure

Bosch, N. A.; Law, A. C.; Walkey, A.

2026-03-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348365 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Anemia is nearly ubiquitous in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), yet little data informs the decision to transfuse blood in this population. Objectives: To determine average and heterogenous effects of blood transfusion in hospitalized patients with CHF. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study with individual treatment effect analysis using the Premier Healthcare Database (2022-2024). Adult patients with CHF hemoglobin concentrations between 6.5-7.4 g/dL were included. The exposure was blood transfusion based on hemoglobin concentration threshold of <7.0 g/dL. The primary outcome was hospital free days by day 28 (HFDs). We determined the average effect of transfusion using instrumental variable analysis based on a hemoglobin threshold of 7.0 g/dL and estimated the predicted effects of transfusions on HFDs (i.e., conditional average treatment effects) for individual patients using causal forest machine learning models. Results: We included 31,408 patients in a derivation cohort and 30,677 in a validation cohort, of which 13,437 (42.8%) and 13,334 (43.5%) received transfusions, respectively. The average association between transfusion and HFDs suggested harm (derivation mean difference -1.8 [95% CI -2.3, -1.3] days; validation mean difference -1.5 [95% CI -2.0, -1.0] days). However, the effects of transfusion were heterogenous (p=0.001) with the strongest drivers of transfusion benefit being transfusion on hospital day 1 and low serum bicarbonate concentration. Conclusions: The average association between transfusion and HFDs in hospitalized patients with CHF suggested harm; however, there were potential small benefits early in hospitalization and in those with low serum bicarbonate concentrations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
3
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
15
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%