Back

A twin-aware multimodal deep learning framework with optimized late fusion for early prediction of adolescent anxiety disorder

Taosif, M.; Chaman, U. M.; Prova, N. A.; Taher, S. M.; Alam, M. G. R.; Rahman, R.

2026-03-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348360 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mental health related problems in adolescents are not always properly evaluated because of incomplete evaluation methods that do not combine biological, behavioral, and demographic details. Therefore, our study proposes a twin-aware multimodal deep learning framework applied to the QTAB dataset for early prediction of adolescent anxiety disorders. We employ a 3D convolutional neural network for neuroimaging data and prototype-based learning modules with residual encoders for behavioral and phenotypic data. Each modality-specific encoder learns compact representations optimized for class-imbalanced prediction through multi-loss objective functions. Calibrated probability outputs from the three modules are combined via optimized weighted late fusion. The framework achieves an AUC of 0.8935 (95% CI: 0.792-0.969), representing an absolute gain of 11 percentage points over the best unimodal baseline (questionnaire: AUC = 0.7766), with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 87.3%. Pairwise statistical testing indicated that the classification patterns of the fusion model differ significantly from the questionnaire-only baseline (McNemar p = 0.0008), though AUC differences did not reach statistical significance at this sample size (DeLong p > 0.05). The best fusion weights were 23% MRI, 63% questionnaire, and 14% phenotypic, highlighting the dominant role of behavioral data. These results demonstrate that calibrated late fusion of multimodal predictions provides robust performance for early adolescent anxiety screening in twin cohorts with family-aware evaluation protocols.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.1%
4
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%