Back

Identifying and quantifying ESKAPEE pathogens in and around sinks in high burden hospitals

Saber, L. B.; Rojas, M.; Blakley, I. C.; Sun, S.; Lott, M. E. J.; Fodor, A. A.; Calderon Toledo, C.; Brown, J.

2026-03-16 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hospital-acquired infections driven by ESKAPEE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Escherichia coli) are highly prevalent. Premise plumbing, sinks and drains, seeds these organisms into patient environments via aerosolization and subsequent surface contamination. We measured viable ESKAPEE pathogens and overall microbial communities in and around sinks in two high-burden hospitals in La Paz, Bolivia, using culture and 16S rDNA sequencing. In a prospective observational study (May-August 2025), we collected 233 surface swabs and 39 air samples across four sink-related surface categories and in room air. Samples were plated on selective media for ESKAPEE identification and quantified as colony-forming units (CFU) normalized to 100 cm2 or 6000 L. DNA was extracted, and the full 16S rDNA gene was sequenced on PacBio Revio, analyzed via DADA2/QIIME2 and R. We detected viable presumptive ESKAPEE pathogens in 74.7% surface swabs and 74.4% air samples. Sink basins were most contaminated (mean 31CFU/100 cm2, 95 % CI16-46); concentrations declined with distance from the drain. Klebsiella/Enterobacter spp. showed the highest mean concentration across samples; S. aureus was most frequently detected (54.4% of samples). Hospital-specific differences were evident in culture positivity (Hospital A 85% vs. Hospital B 66.9%) and community composition (PERMANOVA P = 0.001; sample location explained 21.9% vs. 11.7% of variation). 16S profiling confirmed elevated relative abundances of Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Enterobacter in basins relative to distant surfaces and air. The hospitals studied had high levels of ESKAPEE pathogens, underscoring the need for control measures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
17.1%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
3
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
5
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
7
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
16
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
18
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
23
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%