Hitchhiker bias distorts symptom-based surveillance of infectious diseases
Kumari, K.; Kramer, S. C.; Domenech de Celles, M.
Show abstract
Symptom-based infectious disease surveillance, which infers pathogen circulation by testing individuals who seek care for clinical symptoms, is widely used in public health but may introduce biases that distort our understanding of pathogen dynamics. One such bias, which we introduce and call "hitchhiker bias", occurs when the observed number of hospitalizations of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic pathogens is inflated because they coinfect individuals already being tested for more severe symptoms caused by other pathogens. Using a compartmental SEIR co-infection model, we demonstrate that co-circulation with a symptomatic pathogen significantly distorts the apparent severity and peak time of a hitchhiking virus. These distortions are amplified as the temporal overlap between pathogens increases. We develop and apply a modeling framework to adjust for hitchhiker bias, showing that it can recover the true pathogenicity of viruses that would otherwise be misinterpreted using standard symptom-based surveillance alone.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensible Long-lead Forecast of COVID-19 Epidemic Outcomes 95%
- Different forms of superspreading lead to different outcomes: heterogeneity in infectiousness and contact behavior relevant for the case of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Using real-time data to guide decision-making during an influenza pandemic: a modelling analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention on short- and medium-term dynamics of enterovirus D68 in the US 96%
- Enhanced testing can substantially improve defence against several types of respiratory virus pandemic 96%
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.