Artificial Intelligence in Mammography Screening in Norway (AIMS Norway): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Holen, A. S.; Larsen, M.; Hofvind, S.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectiveIncreasing screening volumes, combined with global shortage of radiologists and a high proportion of normal mammograms, challenge the efficiency and sustainability of breast cancer screening. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve resource allocation, workflow efficiency and diagnostic performance by supporting and partially replacing radiologists in the interpretation process. This randomized, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded trial evaluates whether an AI-supported reading strategy, involving one or two radiologists depending on AI risk stratification, is non-inferior to standard independent double reading. The primary outcome is the number of screen-detected breast cancer cases in each group. MethodsWomen invited to BreastScreen Norway in the Western, Central, and Northern Norway Regional Health Authorities are eligible for inclusion. Following written informed consent, participants are randomized 1:1 to the control group (standard independent double reading by two radiologists) or the intervention group. In the intervention group, mammograms are analyzed using Transpara. Examinations with AI scores of 1-7 are interpreted by a single radiologist, whereas examinations with scores of 8-10 undergo independent double reading. Radiologists are blinded to AI scores and AI image markings during the initial interpretation; this information is disclosed during consensus meetings. Non-inferiority will be assessed by estimating confidence interval for the difference in screen-detected cancer rates between groups. Non-inferiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the confidence interval does not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin. ConclusionsThe trial addresses a critical challenge in breast cancer screening: maintaining diagnostic performance while improving efficiency in the context of workforce constraints and a high prevalence of normal examinations. By evaluating a risk-stratified AI-supported reading strategy within a population-based screening program, the study will provide important evidence on whether AI can be safely integrated to optimize workload distribution while preserving cancer detection rates. Trial registrationThe ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT06032390)
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 96%
- Improved accuracy of breast volume calculation from 3D surface imaging data using statistical shape models 93%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 95%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 95%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II 93%
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 93%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of KPNA2 mutations in breast cancer prognosis: A survey of publicly available databases 91%
- Machine learning predicts rapid relapse of triple negative breast cancer 90%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.