Back

Multivariate Prediction of Conductive Dysfunction in Well and NICU Newborns using Wideband Acoustic Immittance with Acoustic Reflex Tests

Hunter, L. L.; Feeney, M. P.; Fitzpatrick, D.; Keefe, D. H.

2026-03-15 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348314 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe overall goal of this study was to assess tympanometric and ambient wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) tests and wideband acoustic reflex thresholds (ART) in well-baby and newborn intensive care (NICU) cohorts with three specific objectives: 1) Assess predictive accuracy for WBT and ART for conductive dysfunction in ears referring on the first or second stages of newborn hearing screening; 2) Identify inadequate tests likely due to probe blockages or leaks; and 3) Assess prediction models separately for well-baby and NICU screening outcomes. DesignProspective, observational study of full-term (n=514) and premature newborns (n=239) recruited from well-baby and NICU nursery birth hospital newborn hearing screening program. Wideband tympanometry, ambient absorbance, and acoustic reflexes were tested after Stage 1 transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) screening. The reference standard for Pass or Refer groups was initially defined on the stage 1 TEOAE test result. Pass or Refer groups were then reassigned based on the stage 2 screening ABR for those who referred at Stage 1, and all NICU infants. Multivariate models were developed using reflectance and admittance variables to predict conductive dysfunction relative to the screening reference standard in a randomized sub-group of subjects at Stage 1 and Stage 2 screening. Classification accuracy was evaluated on a second, independent sub-group. Individual tests were classified as having inadequate probe fits if they had excessively low values of sound pressure level or susceptance (leak) or absorbance (blockage). ResultsDifferences in ambient absorbance for Pass v. Refer screening groups revealed the greatest differences and effect sizes occurring in frequency bins between 1.4-2 kHz. Screening failure at both Stage 1 and 2 was most accurately predicted by models using ambient absorbance and power level variables at frequencies between 1-2.8 kHz, including ARTs. Tympanometric admittance variables at the positive-pressure tail for frequencies between 1-2.8 kHz in combination with the ART were more accurate predictors than those at peak pressure or the negative-pressure tail. Multivariate models generalized well to an independent group of infants at both Stage 1 and 2 for both the ambient and tympanometric models. Ambient tests revealed more inadequate tests than tympanometric tests, primarily due to blocked probe tips. Exclusion of ears to detect probe leaks or blockages slightly improved the ambient prediction models, but did not affect tympanometric models. ConclusionWideband acoustic reflex tests improved all models for ambient and tympanometric absorbance. Multivariate prediction models developed for WAI tests were repeatable in an independent group of well and NICU infants, suggesting that the results are generalizable to these populations. Detection of probe blockage or leaks slightly improved prediction for ambient measures. Pressurized tests have the advantage of ensuring probe seals due to the need for a hermetic seal, thus are useful to ensure adequate probe insertion.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.2%
2
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
12
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
13
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
19
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%