Back

In Vivo Blood Kinetics and Transcript Integrity of Three mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccines in Humans

Kent, S. J.; Li, S.; Amarasena, T. H.; Reynaldi, A.; Leeming, M. G.; Juno, J. A.; Wheatley, A. K.; Deliyannis, G.; Godfrey, D. I.; Nolan, T.; Pouton, C. W.; Davenport, M. P.; Ju, Y.

2026-03-16 allergy and immunology
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348310 medRxiv
Show abstract

mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines are detectable in human blood after vaccination, but platform-specific differences in systemic persistence and transcript integrity remain poorly defined. We analyzed serial blood samples from 73 participants receiving Moderna mRNA-1273 (three formulations), Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2, or an investigational receptor-binding domain (RBD) mRNA vaccine (three different doses). Using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays, we quantified total and long-range linked ("intact") vaccine mRNA, and we measured vaccine-specific ionizable lipids by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Across platforms, mRNA decay was fastest for mRNA-1273, intermediate for BNT162b2, and slowest for the RBD vaccine, with ionizable lipid decay following the same rank order. Notably, intact spike mRNA declined two-fold faster after mRNA-1273 than BNT162b2 vaccination. Kinetics modelling revealed platform-dependent coupling of mRNA and lipid kinetics: intact mRNA tracked closely with SM-102 for mRNA-1273, whereas ALC-0315 persisted longer than intact mRNA for BNT162b2. A ten-fragment linkage ddPCR panel spanning the spike transcript showed lower linkage toward 3'-proximal regions that mirrored the administered mRNA-1273 formulation. Together, these data establish a quantitative framework for benchmarking mRNA-LNP platform kinetics and transcript integrity in humans.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.