Back

Associations of endogenous and exogenous hormonal exposures and cardiovascular disease in women - A FinnGen study

Korhonen, T.-M.; Berrandou, T.-E.; Joensuu, L.; FinnGen, ; Laukkanen, J. A.; Sillanpaa, E.; Bouatia-Naji, N.; Laakkonen, E. K.

2026-03-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.13.26348304 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarlier age at menopause and shorter reproductive span (time from menarche to menopause) have been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), presumably because of limited lifetime exposure to endogenous estrogen. Our intention is to determine whether genetic liability to earlier vs later menarche and menopause are associated with risk of common cardiovascular diseases in women. We also aim to investigate effects of exogenous estrogen exposure in the form of systemic hormonal contraceptive and menopausal hormone therapy use. Methods and resultsWe determined GWAS summary statistics for age at menopause, age at menarche, and length of the reproductive period with data derived from UK Biobank (UKBB) European-ancestry participants. We calculated polygenic scores for women from FinnGen study (N=184 132) that indirectly capture genetic variation in endogenous estrogen exposure: age at menopause, age at menarche, and length of reproductive span. We also investigated exogenous hormone exposure associated with use of menopausal hormone therapy or systemic hormonal contraceptives. We used Cox proportional hazards model to investigate associations between PGSes and exogenous estrogen exposure and risk of hypertension, stroke, and coronary heart disease (CHD) events. Median follow-up time was 25.8 years. During the follow-up 56 143 women experienced hypertension, 18 200 women experienced strokes, and 13 879 women experienced major CHD events. Genetic liability to later menopause and longer reproductive span were weakly associated with a higher risk of stroke: in models adjusted with smoking and BMI, the hazard ratio (HR) per one standard deviation increase in PGS was 1.03 [1.01-1.05] for both. Menopausal hormone therapy use was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR 0.85 [0.82 - 0.89]) and CHD (HR 0.80 [0.76 - 0.84]). Systemic hormonal contraceptive use was associated with lower risk of hypertension (HR 0.96 [0.93 - 0.99]), stroke (HR 0.84 [0.80 - 0.99]) and CHD events (HR 0.83 [0.78-0.89]). ConclusionsAlthough observational evidence consistently associates a longer reproductive span with lower cardiometabolic risk, the polygenic component of metabolic timing (PGSes for reproductive span and age at menopause) showed the opposite direction of association. This discrepancy likely reflects the fact that these scores capture genetic pathways only partially overlapping with phenotypic lifetime estrogen exposure. Importantly, the observed cardioprotective associations of menopausal hormone therapy and systemic hormonal contraception underscore that genetic predisposition and exogenous hormonal exposure represent distinct biological dimensions relevant to cardiovascular risk in women. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIWe combined genetic data and information of register-based hormone purchases from over 180 000 women to investigate associations between endogenous and exogenous estrogen exposure and cardiovascular diseases. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIOur results suggest that genetic predisposition to a later natural menopause and longer reproductive span are not protective towards cardiovascular diseases. C_LIO_LIExogenous hormones were associated with lower long-term risk of stroke and coronary heart disease events. This implies that even if the current use of exogenous estrogen may increase stroke risk, the long-term stroke risk may decrease compared to women who never used hormones. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
3
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
25
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%