Back

Differential chromatin looping regulated by two GA-binding transcription factors creates an X-specific chromatin environment for dosage compensation

Aguilera, J. L.; Cortez, K.; Segarra Alonzo, L. C.; Aldana, M.; Aragon Vasquez, A.; Gray, C.; Woodman-Sousa, M.; Grive, K. J.; Ray, M.; Larschan, E.

2026-03-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.12.711449 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanisms by which differential occupancy of transcription factors (TFs) at similar binding sites leads to context-specific targeting of large transcription complexes remain poorly understood. X chromosome upregulation (XCU), the most highly conserved step in dosage compensation and best studied in Drosophila, serves as a model for understanding how differential occupancy of similar TFs functions context-specifically. Sequence variation within GA-repeat motifs that accumulated on the X chromosome over evolutionary time promotes the binding of a specific GA-binding TF (CLAMP) that recruits the dosage compensation complex (DCC) while outcompeting another similar TF (GAF). However, the mechanism by which CLAMP-GAF competition drives specific targeting of the DCC to the X chromosome remains unknown. Because DCC binding sites cluster in 3D space, we combined Micro-C and Hi-ChIP to determine that CLAMP and GAF directly mediate largely mutually exclusive 3D genomic contacts. Specifically, we show that CLAMP but not GAF drives local short-range interactions that directly link high affinity DCC binding sites with active, dosage-compensated housekeeping genes. In contrast, GAF mediates interactions between transcriptionally silent insulator regions on the X chromosome spanning a wider range of genomic distances. Together, these findings demonstrate that CLAMP outcompetes GAF at active regions on the X chromosome, but not autosomes, to create an X-chromosome specific chromatin environment for dosage compensation. Overall, we provide new insight into how differential TF binding at similar binding sites drives context-specific targeting of transcription complexes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.