Back

A systematic analysis of brain tissue response to microelectrode material and size with single-cell spatial transcriptomics

Thompson, C.; Chakraborty, A.; Wade-Kleyn, L.; Reimers, M.; Purcell, E.

2026-03-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.12.711361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Implantable microelectrode arrays can interface with the central nervous system to record from and/or stimulate neural tissues to treat neurological disease and injury. The chronic tissue response to implanted electrodes is believed to be a driving factor behind microelectrode failure. Next-generation electrodes have been developed to attenuate the tissue response by reducing electrode size and/or incorporating softer materials. In this study, we used single-cell-resolution spatial transcriptomics to quantify the tissue response to implanted electrodes within custom-classified cell types in the rat brain. To test the effects of implant material and size, we assessed polyimide and silicon electrodes of 10 {micro}m and 100 {micro}m cross-sectional dimensions over 6-weeks post-implantation. Our data indicate that implants are associated with upregulation of inflammatory genes in glia that are coupled to damage-initiated losses in synaptic transmission and subsequent engagement of compensatory protective mechanisms (e.g., re-myelination, antioxidant production) to preserve local neurons. While bulk tissue analysis reinforced previously reported observations of glial scar consolidation over time, single cell analysis revealed an unexpected, progressive heightening of the expression of inflammatory genes in individual device-reactive astrocytes. With respect to design features, the impact of device dimensions more heavily influenced responses than material type, particularly by the 6-week time point. Our results add single-cell resolution observations to the growing use of transcriptomics to understand the biocompatibility of devices implanted in the brain.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.1%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
11
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
19
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%