Back

Mapping Active-Site Conformational Ensembles Along Competing Catalytic Pathways of the Hairpin Ribozyme

Forget, S.; Stirnemann, G.

2026-03-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.12.711346 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The catalytic mechanism of the hairpin ribozyme has remained controversial for more than two decades, with different experimental approaches often supporting distinct mechanistic interpretations. In this work, we investigate the conformational landscape of the active site along several proposed reaction pathways using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent combined with enhanced sampling techniques. Specifically, we employ Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations to extensively explore active-site conformations without relying on predefined collective variables, enabling a broad characterization of the structural ensembles associated with multiple protonation states along three candidate reaction mechanisms. Our simulations suggest that a dianionic general acid/general base pathway involving direct participation of A38 and G8 is unlikely to proceed through well-defined intermediates with catalytically competent geometries. In particular, states associated with G8 deprotonation and subsequent O2 deprotonation exhibit strongly distorted active-site arrangements that appear poorly suited for reaction progression. Although highly synchronous protontransfer steps cannot be excluded, the required deprotonation of G8 remains difficult to reconcile with neutral pH conditions. In contrast, monoanionic pathways in which the non-bridging oxygens of the scissile phosphate act as transient proton relays produce intermediates that sample geometries favorable for the nucleophilic addition and leaving-group elimination steps of the reaction. These mechanisms do not require direct catalytic involvement of G8 while remaining compatible with potential acid catalysis by protonated A38+. Our results provide a unified conformational perspective on competing mechanistic scenarios. The ensembles generated here offer a foundation for future QM/MM and ML/MM calculations aimed at quantitatively resolving the free-energy landscapes governing hairpin ribozyme catalysis. Finally, the present strategy could easily be applied to other biomolecular systems with high conformational plasticity, including other ribozymes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.3%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
17
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
24
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%