Back

CAPZ, but not canonical autophagy, regulates the endosomal-exosomal trafficking of plasma membrane PD-L1

Xu, P.; Ye, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, N.; Chan, C.-F.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Peng, M.; Lu, Y.; Yue, J.

2026-03-13 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.12.711228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) undergoes continuous endocytosis and intracellular trafficking that regulate its degradation, recycling, and exosomal release. Although PD-L1 internalization is known to depend on RAB5-mediated endocytosis, whether canonical autophagy contributes to its subsequent endosomal trafficking remains unclear. Here we show that the endosomal and exosomal trafficking of cell surface PD-L1 occurs independently of the canonical autophagy machinery. Genetic disruption of core autophagy components, including LC3B, ATG4B, ATG5, and ATG7, did not impair trafficking of internalized PD-L1 to early endosomes, multivesicular bodies, late endosomes, or extracellular vesicles. Pharmacologic inhibition of autophagosome-lysosome fusion enhanced accumulation of PD-L1 within RAB5-and CD63-positive compartments, but this effect persisted in cells lacking LC3B, ATG5, or ATG7, indicating that PD-L1 trafficking through the endosomal-exosomal pathway does not require canonical autophagy. Instead, we identify the actin-capping protein CAPZ as a key regulator of an endosomal maturation checkpoint that controls PD-L1 sorting. Loss of CAPZ impaired progression of PD-L1 from early to late endosomal compartments, reduced PD-L1 incorporation into multivesicular bodies and extracellular vesicles, and redirected PD-L1 toward RAB11-dependent recycling, resulting in increased plasma membrane PD-L1 abundance. These findings establish that PD-L1 membrane fate is determined by CAPZ-dependent endosomal maturation rather than canonical autophagy and identify endosomal trafficking machinery as a critical regulator of immune checkpoint distribution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.