Back

Resurrected in the field: benefits of rapid adaptation to historic drought seen mainly at the leading edge of a plant' species range

Pennington, L. K.; Sexton, J. P.

2026-03-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.12.711156 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Montane plant populations are experiencing novel conditions due to climate change. Furthermore, climate change is causing increased climate perturbations, such as the 2012-2016 drought in the western US, remarkable in its aridity, longevity, and warmer temperatures. This drought provided an opportunity to understand how montane populations respond to extreme perturbations, including at range limits. We resurrected seeds of the endemic annual plant Erythranthe laciniata, collected in 2008 or earlier (before the drought) and in 2014 (the height of the drought), in a common garden experiment to understand how drought influenced evolution in contemporary field conditions. The study included nine populations across the species range, including range edges. Over 2,100 replicates were sown in three common gardens at natural populations at low, central, and high elevations. We recorded phenology and flower production to estimate lifetime fitness. This experiment took place in 2021, a year with low precipitation and high temperatures. We found higher fitness in the drought generation at the high garden, while both generations showed similar fitness at the central and low gardens. We detected climate adaptation at the low and high gardens, and rapidly evolved faster phenology at the high garden. Lifetime fitness was substantially lower at lower gardens overall, even for low-elevation populations. Low-elevation populations outperformed central populations at the central garden, suggesting adaptive mismatch. Together, these results indicate rapid contemporary adaptation that is beneficial at the leading edge of the species range. Nevertheless, low fitness at lower elevations may foreshadow range contraction under continued climate change.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
3
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
13
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
15
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
30
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%