Impact of Glucose Trajectories on Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The ATACH-2 trial
Fayed, M.; Saini, N.; Edwards, S.; Zeng, C.; Duan, L.; Singh, A.; Khanna, A.; Wilson, C. A.; Qureshi, A. I.; Peng, T. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundHyperglycemia after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may be associated with worse outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the association of early post-ICH glucose trajectories and clinical outcomes. MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of the ATACH-2 trial dataset. Hyperglycemia was defined as a blood glucose of [≥]140 mg/dl. Glucose levels at 0h, 24h, 48h, and 72h were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model, with fixed effects for time and random intercept/slopes. Patient-specific estimates were used to predict glucose values at 0h and 72h, informed by all four timepoints, to classify patients into the following glycemic trajectory groups: (1) early hyperglycemia, (2) late hyperglycemia, (3) persistent hyperglycemia, and (4) persistent normoglycemia. Outcomes were compared using univariate analysis and log-rank test survival analysis. Good outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Score of 0 to 2. The association between glycemic trajectories and functional outcomes was tested using logistic regression models adjusted for patient demographics and clinical variables. ResultsOf 1000 patients (median age 62 [IQR 52-71]; 38% female) in the study, 81 (8.1%) had early hyperglycemia, 59 (5.9%) late hyperglycemia, 225 (22.5%) persistent hyperglycemia, and 635 (63.5%) persistent normoglycemia. On univariate analysis, 45.8% of patients with persistent normoglycemia had favorable 90-day functional outcomes compared to 30.9% in early, 30.5% in late, and 32.0% in persistent hyperglycemia patients (p<0.001). The late hyperglycemia patients had the highest rate of hematoma expansion (35.3%, p=0.029) and the lowest Kaplan Meier-estimated survival (86%, p=0.015). In adjusted multivariable regression models, early hyperglycemia was significantly associated with a poor functional outcome (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.10-4.68, p=0.026). ConclusionEarly hyperglycemia was associated with worse functional outcomes, while late and persistent hyperglycemia were associated with worse survival rates. These findings suggest that glycemic trajectories may affect or predict prognosis. This highlights the importance of continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control strategies after ICH.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood Pressure Control From 2011 To 2019 In Patients 90 Days After Stroke 94%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 94%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 95%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 92%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 91%
- Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
- Deviation From Personalized Blood Pressure Targets Correlates With Worse Outcome After Successful Recanalization 93%
- The ABCs of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Blood Volume Measurement: A Simplified Quantitative Method Predicts Outcomes and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.