Back

Effectiveness of a digital health application (levidex) on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial (LAMONT)

Meyer, B.; Nelles, G.; Betz, L.; Bergmann, A.; Jauch-Chara, K.; Krause, N.; Riemann, K.; von Glasenapp, B.; Heesen, C.

2026-03-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348037 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeople with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) often experience impaired quality of life (QoL) despite receiving standard care. Digital therapeutics (DTx) may offer support, but prior trials yielded mixed results, possibly due to active controls and high baseline QoL. We therefore evaluated a DTx (levidex) as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU) in pwMS with impaired QoL. MethodsIn this pragmatic, online randomised controlled trial (LAMONT; NCT06090305), n = 470 pwMS with a score [≥]2 on the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) were randomised to levidex + TAU or TAU alone. The primary endpoint was HAQUAMS total score at 6 months, analysed by intention-to-treat ANCOVA. ResultsCompared with TAU, levidex + TAU improved MS-specific QoL at 6 months (baseline-adjusted mean difference -0.10; 95% CI -0.18 to -0.03; p = 0.008; Cohens d = 0.26). Clinically relevant HAQUAMS improvement ([≥]0.22) occurred more often with levidex (39.5% vs 27.8%; number needed to treat = 9). Benefits also emerged for depressive symptoms and social/work functioning but not for anxiety. No serious adverse events occurred and user satisfaction was high. ConclusionsIn pwMS with impaired QoL, adding the scalable DTx levidex to TAU yields meaningful improvements in QoL and functioning.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
18
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
19
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%