Back

Rapid and Interpretable AMR Diagnostics via Genomics and Cell Painting using Differential Geometry-based Directed-Simplicial Neural Networks on Multimodal Data

Thakur, L. S.; Mahajan, S. S.; Bharj, G.; Ding, M.; Dekanoidze, N.; Shrivastava, V.

2026-03-12 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.11.711128 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a critical global health challenge, particularly in high-prevalence regions such as India, where rapid and interpretable diagnostic tools are urgently needed. To address this challenge, we present a computational framework for AMR prediction that integrates genomic and cellular phenotypic data using an in-house developed differential geometry-based Directed Simplicial Neural Network (Dg-Dir-SNNs) applied to multimodal datasets. Using this framework, we analyzed 384 clinically relevant AMR isolates, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, integrating 256 genomic k-mer features with 503 cellular morphology descriptors derived from high-content Cell Painting assays. The Dg-Dir-SNNs model constructs an inferred-causal network of top-ranked biomarker-driving features, predicting potential directional dependencies among genomic motifs and phenotypic features. Network analysis identified kmer_TATG as the top-ranked driver associated with predicted resistance, with a local neighborhood including other genomic motifs (kmer_TTTT, kmer_CGTG, kmer_TCAC, kmer_CGTA, kmer_GAAA, kmer_TAAA, kmer_TACA, kmer_TGTG, kmer_TGAG, kmer_AAAA) and a key morphological feature (Cells_correlation_ER_Brightfield). These relationships suggest potential mechanistic associations in which specific genomic motifs may influence cellular phenotypes linked to antimicrobial resistance. Although not yet clinically deployed, this approach demonstrates the potential of multimodal AI-driven modeling for rapid in silico AMR prediction. By providing interpretable, biologically grounded insights, the framework may support future diagnostic development, targeted surveillance strategies, and experimental validation in high-resistance healthcare settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.5%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
12
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
15
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
28
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
30
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%