Back

Mean temperature determines whether winter variability accelerates or buffers energy loss

Waybright, S. A.; Glass, J. R.; Dodge, D. M. S.; Keaveny, E. C.; White, S. A.; Dillon, M. E.

2026-03-13 physiology
10.64898/2026.03.11.711084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Winter survival in dormant animals depends on conserving finite energy reserves, yet winter temperatures fluctuate around shifting means. In ectotherms, metabolic rate increases exponentially with temperature, so thermal variability is expected to accelerate energy loss, with important consequences for overwinter survival and population persistence under climate change. However, it remains unclear whether dormant ectotherms can compensate physiologically for thermal variability. We overwintered Bombus impatiens queens under constant (2, 3, 4{degrees}C) or variable (2 {+/-} 6{degrees}C or 4 {+/-} 6{degrees}C) regimes for six weeks, then measured metabolic rates across a range of temperatures. The temperature dependence of metabolic rate shifted in response to thermal experience, but the direction of compensation depended on mean temperature: variability centered on 2{degrees}C elevated metabolic rate and increased thermal sensitivity relative to all other conditions, whereas variability centered on 4{degrees}C reduced metabolic rate and dampened thermal sensitivity relative to constant 4{degrees}C. We used these metabolic responses to simulate rates of lipid depletion and found that survival trajectories echoed physiological shifts: experiencing variability around 2{degrees}C would reduce subsequent survival time, whereas experiencing variability around 4{degrees}C would preserve subsequent survival even under variable future conditions. Thus, identical thermal variance produced opposite energetic outcomes depending on the mean temperature around which fluctuations occurred. Integrating both temperature means and variability is, therefore, essential for predicting overwintering survival in a changing world.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.6%
2
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.9%
7
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
14
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
18
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%