Back

Lempel-Ziv complexity of simultaneous surface electromyography and magnetomyography during muscle fatigue

Semeia, L.; Yang, H.; Zimmer, M.; Siegel, M.; Roehrle, O.; Marquetand, J.

2026-03-13 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.11.711052 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveComplexity-based metrics have been applied to surface electromyography (sEMG) to characterize fatigue-related changes in the temporal structure of myoelectric signals beyond amplitude and spectral features. Optically pumped magnetometers (OPM) are sensors that enable non-invasive recordings of magnetomyographic (MMG) signals from skeletal muscle and are increasingly used to complement surface electromyography; however, it remains unclear whether complexity measures derived from magnetic recordings are comparable to those obtained from sEMG. Here, we directly compared fatigue-related dynamics of conventional and complexity-based signal features of sEMG and OPM-MMG measured from the biceps brachii during sustained elbow flexion. ApproachHealthy participants performed isometric contractions at 20% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC; 20 min) or 60% MVC (3 min). sEMG and OPM-based MMG were recorded simultaneously, and signal median frequency, root mean square (RMS), and Lempel-Ziv (LZ) complexity were calculated over time. Main resultsAcross contraction intensities, sEMG and MMG showed consistent fatigue-related changes, characterized by increasing RMS, decreasing median frequency, and a progressive decline in LZ over time. In addition, multiple regression analyses indicated that the decrease in LZ was not fully accounted for by concurrent amplitude or spectral changes, suggesting that complexity captures aspects of signal organization that are not fully explained by established features. Finally, while sEMG showed higher LZ complexity and median frequency at 60% compared to 20% MVC, corresponding intensity-dependent effects were not observed in OPM-based MMG. SignificanceThese findings suggest that complexity-based metrics capture fatigue-related changes in neuromuscular signal organization beyond conventional measures, and that sEMG and OPM-based MMG provide similar, though modality-specific, information. Together, the results support the use of complexity metrics in multimodal electrophysiological and biomagnetic assessments of neuromuscular fatigue.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.9%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
13
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
22
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
25
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%