Back

Investigating the function of C-terminal tails of human tubulin isotypes in the motility regulation of cytoplasmic dynein

Garg, J.; Lopes Ribeiro, J.; Wallin, J. S.; Alisaraie, L.

2026-03-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.11.711045 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The intracellular transport system is pivotal for cellular function and integrity, facilitated by cytoskeletal motor proteins such as dynein, which traverse along microtubules (MTs). The heterogeneity of the tubulin isotypes composing MTs introduces functional diversity, potentially affecting cytoskeletal motor proteins interactions with the MT. This in silico study investigated the influence of amino acid sequence variations in the C-terminal tails (CTTs) of six different Homo sapiens tubulin isotypes, TUBB2A, TUBB2B, TUBB2C, TUBB3, TUBB4A, and TUBB5, highly expressed in human brain tumors, and assessed the isotypes effect on the binding of motor protein dynein to MT. Among these isotypes, TUBB2A, TUBB2B, and TUBB2C were found to affect conformational motions of the dyneins microtubule-binding domain (MTBD) and stalk domain. The investigation highlighted the novel role of isotype-specific variations in lateral interactions between tubulin protofilaments (PFs) in determining the proximity of the {beta}-CTT of the adjacent PF to the MTBD, potentially affecting dyneins motility and suggesting how changes in isotype expression directly influence dyneins velocity and processivity and contribute to transport defects associated with neurological disorders and cancers. Isolating specific tubulin isotypes experimentally is challenging due to their high sequence similarity and complex interactions with other microtubule-associated proteins. This makes it challenging to distinguish between different tubulin isotypes and their effects, particularly in tissues where multiple isotypes are co-expressed. Additionally, these isotypes are heavily modified in vivo by post-translational modifications, which further complicate the isolation of a single, unmodified tubulin isotype. As a result, computational approaches have been necessary in this study for exploring these effects in a controlled, isotype-specific manner.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
3
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
9
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
13
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
18
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
24
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
28
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%