Back

Deep mutational scanning of recent SARS-CoV-2 variants highlights changing amino acid preferences within epistatic hotspot residues

Taylor, A.; Starr, T. N.

2026-03-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.11.711006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep mutational scans across receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of diverging SARS-CoV-2 variants reveal ongoing changes to the effects of mutations, a phenomenon known as epistasis. Careful accounting for these altered mutational effects is important in viral surveillance and forecasting, and more broadly, for understanding the impacts of epistasis on real-world viral evolutionary trajectories. Using a yeast-display RBD deep mutational scanning (DMS) platform, we measure the impacts of virtually all single amino acid mutations and single-residue deletions in the Omicron KP.3.1.1 and LP.8.1 RBDs on folded RBD expression and binding affinity for the human ACE2 receptor. Our comprehensive maps reveal patterns of evolutionary accessibility and constraint at single-residue resolution and when compared to prior datasets, highlight sites whose amino acid preferences continue to change across viral variants. Notably, sites 455, 456, and 493 - which have exhibited repeated substitutions and epistatic dependencies across Omicron subvariants going back to BA.1 - again demonstrate altered patterns of mutational accessibility and constraint. Therefore, it appears that these hotspots of repeated RBD evolution have not yet converged on fixed amino acid solutions, but instead remain sites of ongoing epistatic reconfiguration. We compare our measurements of direct RBD:ACE2 affinity with recently published measurements of mutation impacts on ACE2 binding in the full quaternary spike context, which also integrates the effects of spike conformational dynamics; our analysis uncovers mutations like H505W that could favor adoption of the down/closed RBD conformation as a viral strategy for future antigenic evolution.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.6%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.4%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
9
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.6%
24
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
27
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%