Back

Predominant tetraploidy and lack of ploidy-associated genetic structure across invasive Lantana camara populations in India

Praveen, P.; Ramakrishnan, U.

2026-03-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.11.710965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Polyploidization is widely recognised as a major driver of plant diversification, with many species persisting as mixed-ploidy systems where multiple cytotypes co-exist. Polyploids are disproportionately represented among invasive species, yet their role in facilitating biological invasions remains poorly understood. Lantana camara, one of the worlds most successful invasive plants, exhibits remarkable cytotype diversity, but the distribution and evolutionary relationships of these cytotypes in its native and invasive ranges have remained unclear. Here, we characterise ploidy variation and assess genetic differentiation among cytotypes in invasive L. camara populations across India. Flow cytometry of more than a thousand individuals reveals that tetraploids overwhelmingly dominate the invasive range, accounting for more than 95% of individuals, while triploids and hexaploids occur at much lower frequencies. Using genome-wide ddRAD-derived SNP markers from diploids, triploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids, we find no genetic differentiation among cytotypes. Instead, individuals of different ploidy levels cluster together across multiple genetic clusters, consistent with recurrent and potentially independent origins of polyploids. These patterns further suggest that L. camara polyploids likely arise via autopolyploid formation. Together, our results establish tetraploidy as the predominant cytotype in Indias invasive populations and reveal a lack of cytotype-specific genetic structure. These findings highlight the need to investigate the ecological advantages of tetraploids and the mechanisms that generate cytotype diversity, key steps toward understanding how polyploidy contributes to the invasive success of this globally important species.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
20
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%