Back

Theory of Cell Body Lensing and Phototaxis Sign Reversal in "Eyeless" Mutants of Chlamydomonas

Birwa, S. K.; Yang, M.; Goldstein, R. E.; Pesci, A. I.

2026-03-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.11.710819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phototaxis of many species of green algae relies upon directional sensitivity of their membrane-bound photoreceptors, which arises from the presence of a pigmented "eyespot" behind them that blocks light passing through the cell body from reaching the photoreceptor. A decade ago it was discovered that the spherical cell body of the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii acts as a lens to concentrate incoming light, and that in "eyeless" mutants of Chlamydomonas the consequence of that focused light reaching the photoreceptor from behind is a reversal in the sign of phototaxis relative to the wild type behavior. We present a quantitative theory of this sign reversal by completing a recent simplified analysis of lensing [Yang, et al., Phys. Rev. E 113, 022401 (2026)] and incorporating it into an adaptive model for Chlamydomonas phototaxis. This model shows that phototactic dynamics in the presence of lensing is subtle because of the existence of internal light caustics when the cellular index of refraction exceeds that of water. During each period of cellular rotation about its body-fixed axis, the photoreceptor receives two competing signals: a relatively long, slowly-varying signal from the direct illumination, and a stronger, shorter, rapidly-varying lensed signal. The reversal of the sign of phototaxis is then a consequence of the dominance of the flagellar photoresponse to the signal with the higher time derivative. These features lead to a quantitative understanding of phototaxis sign reversal, including bistability in the direction choice, a prediction that can be tested in single-cell tracking studies of mutant phototaxis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.9%
3
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.8%
7
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%