Back

Car-Macrophages Activate Anti Tumor T Cells In The Absence Of Phagocytosis

Feldmann, L.; Vaysse, A.; Lemaitre, F.; Corre, B.; ALONSO, R.; VAGANAY, C.; GUERIN, M. V.; Garcia, Z.; Bousso, P.; GRANDJEAN, C.

2026-03-12 immunology
10.64898/2026.03.11.710792 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macrophages are highly abundant within the tumor microenvironment and serve as an essential bridge between innate and adaptive immune responses. Thus, they have emerged as promising candidates for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapeutic strategies. Previous studies demonstrated that adenovirally-transduced CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), used in clinical trials, can perform tumor cell phagocytosis, reshape the tumor microenvironment towards a proinflammatory state, and promote host T cell activation. However, how early interactions between CAR-M and tumor cells shape subsequent T cell effector functions remains poorly understood. Particularly, uncoupling the adenoviral-induced proinflammatory phenotype from CAR-M effector functions remains to be dissected. Here, using phagocytosis-optimized CAR-Ms, we demonstrated that T cells are crucial mediators of CAR-M therapeutic efficacy. Mechanistically, we identify that CAR-M-derived cytokines and chemokines are key drivers of T cell functions while antigen cross presentation appears largely dispensable. Dynamic imaging of CAR-M-tumor cell interactions revealed heterogenous phagocytic abilities, regardless of contact duration. Finally, we show that non-phagocytic interactions can instruct pro-inflammatory macrophage repolarization and subsequent T cell activation. Altogether, these findings define an alternative mode of CAR-M action in which CAR engagement alone, independently of target cell uptake, is sufficient to enhance T cell functions. Our study underscores the importance of non-phagocytic CAR signaling as an additional mechanism for CAR-M effector functions opening new avenues for the design of next generation CAR for macrophage-based therapies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.