Back

Under-recognized or Under-reported? A Global Bibliometric Analysis (1994-2025) of Neurological Assessment in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

Rodrigues, J. C. M.; da Conceicao, B. C.; Pantoja, L. V. P. S.; Machado-Ferraro, K. M.; Maia, M. L. F.; Souza-Junior, F. J. C.; Lima, R. R.; Cunha, R. A.; de Castro, R. E. V.; Bezerra, F.; Fernandes, L. M. P.; Fontes-Junior, E. A.; Maia, C.

2026-03-13 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348139 medRxiv
Show abstract

Critically ill children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) face significant neurological risks, but it remains unclear whether neurological assessments are adequately integrated into clinical routines. We aimed to evaluate the global scientific landscape regarding neurological examination in PICU, combining bibliometric analysis with clinical-guided critical analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC) using terms related to pediatric critical care and neurological evaluation. Eligible publications were original research articles approaching neurological assessment during PICU stay. Bibliometric indicators, science mapping, and study design profiling were analyzed. In a separate, clinically guided interpretative layer, reporting patterns related to timing, tools, and strategies of neurological assessment were synthesized. From 359 records, 128 articles met inclusion criteria. The United States accounted for over half of the publications, while most studies employed retrospective designs and focused on traumatic brain injury or cardiac arrest. Despite the relevance of clinical neurological examination - especially using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), advanced neuromonitoring tools, e.g., EEG, intracranial pressure monitoring, and biomarkers were inconsistently applied. Notably, neurological evaluations were often underreported at admission and discharge and rarely extended to non-neurological PICU conditions. Our findings reveal a critical gap between the neurological vulnerability of PICU patients, and the limited, inconsistent assessment strategies reported in the literature. Expanding structured neurological evaluation to all critically ill children, not only those with overt neurological diagnoses, seems essential to promote brain health and long-term recovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
2
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
6
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
14
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
23
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
25
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%