Back

Patient Perspectives and Satisfaction: Educational Needs and Communication Barriers in Dermatology Clinics in Saudi Arabia - A Cross-Sectional Survey

Alshammarie, F.; Alhobera, A.; Alshammari, M.

2026-03-12 dermatology
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348118 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeUnderstanding patient perspectives is essential to improving quality and satisfaction of care in dermatology clinics. In Saudi Arabia, limited national data exist on patients educational needs and communication barriers. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction, identify educational gaps, and explore communication challenges in dermatology clinics across Saudi Arabia. Patients and methodsA national cross-sectional survey was conducted among 976 dermatology patients. A structured questionnaire evaluated demographics, perceived knowledge, satisfaction with information provided, communication barriers, and preferred educational methods. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used for analysis. ResultsAmong participants who had attended dermatology clinics (n = 795), 61.6% reported frequent or occasional confusion about their condition, and only 45.4% demonstrated high self-reported knowledge. Overall satisfaction was moderate, with 58.3% satisfied or very satisfied, while 9.9% reported dissatisfaction. The most reported communication barriers were limited consultation time (25.2%) and patient anxiety about asking questions (15.3%). Patients felt least informed about treatment options (22.6%), diagnosis (20.3%), and potential side effects (19.3%). Most participants (70.6%) preferred language communication to be in Arabic, and 78% favored the physical method of face-to-face education consultation. Patient knowledge, barriers and preferences significantly differed with age, gender, and condition complexity (p < 0.05). ConclusionDermatology patients in Saudi Arabia report moderate satisfaction with substantial educational needs and communication barriers. Addressing consultation time constraints, fostering supportive communication environments, and providing patient-centered, language-appropriate education; particularly through direct face-to-face interactions will aid to enhance understanding, satisfaction, and engagement in for an overall better provider-patient dermatologic care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
2
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
5
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%