Back

MCA-UNet: A Multi-Scale Context and Attention U-Net for Colorectal Polyp Segmentation

Dong, Y.; Fang, G.; Du, R.; Hu, H.; Fang, Z.; Guo, C.; Lu, R.; Jia, Y.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Z.

2026-03-16 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348049 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTo propose an improved U-Net-based segmentation model for colorectal polyp segmentation, aiming to address the challenges of variable lesion morphology, ambiguous boundaries, complex background interference, and insufficient cross-level feature fusion in endoscopic images [5,12]. MethodsAn improved network termed MCA-UNet was developed based on U-Net [5]. The model incorporates a multi-scale context convolution block (MCCB) to enhance multi-scale feature extraction and an attention-guided feature fusion module (AGFF) to optimize skip-feature selection and fusion in the decoder. Experiments were conducted on publicly available colorectal polyp image datasets, including Kvasir-SEG and CVC-ClinicDB [13-15]. Four models, including U-Net, U-Net+MCCB, U-Net+AGFF, and MCA-UNet, were compared, and all models were trained for 100 epochs. Dice, intersection over union (IoU), and mean absolute error (MAE) were used as the main evaluation metrics [20]. ResultsOn the mixed validation set, the Dice scores of U-Net, U-Net+MCCB, U-Net+AGFF, and MCA-UNet were 0.742, 0.771, 0.754, and 0.783, respectively; the corresponding IoU values were 0.603, 0.635, 0.618, and 0.649; and the MAE values were 0.102, 0.090, 0.097, and 0.086. Compared with the baseline U-Net, MCA-UNet improved Dice and IoU by 5.53% and 7.63%, respectively, while reducing MAE by 15.69%. Comparisons on the Kvasir-SEG and CVC-ClinicDB validation subsets further demonstrated the more stable performance of the proposed model. ConclusionBy jointly integrating multi-scale contextual modeling and attention-guided feature fusion, MCA-UNet effectively improves the accuracy and robustness of colorectal polyp segmentation and may provide useful support for intelligent endoscopic image analysis [12,17,18].

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
25
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%