Back

Culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing reveals within-patient diversity and transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

Mills, E.; Evans, K.; Dorazio, A.; Squires, K.; Sundermann, A. J.; Stellfox, M.; Culyba, M.; Shields, R.; Van Tyne, D.

2026-03-16 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348025 medRxiv
Show abstract

Colonization of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) often precedes bloodstream infection and serves as a reservoir for onward patient transmission in healthcare settings. Routine clonal isolate-based sequencing often underestimates within-patient diversity, and can miss transmission involving low-abundance and co-colonizing strains. Here we applied culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing to matched GI tract and blood VREfm populations collected [≤]14 days apart from 35 patients with positive VREfm blood cultures collected between 2020 and 2025 at a single hospital. GI populations exhibited greater within-patient diversity than bloodstream populations, including multi-strain colonization in five patients. Among single-strain populations, variant analysis suggested distinct environment-specific pressures between the GI tract and bloodstream environments. To assess transmission using culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing, we compared all 70 VREfm populations against 470 contemporary clinical VREfm isolate genomes collected from the same hospital and identified 19 putative transmission clusters, including six clusters involving multi-strain populations. Together, these results demonstrate how culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing improves resolution for assessing within-patient VREfm diversity and enhances the detection of transmission events that could be missed by clonal isolate-based surveillance. Impact StatementVREfm bloodstream infection is often seeded from bacteria colonizing the gut. The genetic diversity within gut and blood VREfm populations, and the role of this diversity in bacterial transmission, has been difficult to resolve as genomic surveillance typically relies on sequencing a clonal clinical isolate from each patient. Using culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing of matched GI tract and bloodstream VREfm populations from 35 patients at a single hospital, we found that the GI tract reservoir contained VREfm populations with greater strain and variant diversity than populations collected from the bloodstream. By integrating population sequencing with a large collection of VREfm clinical isolate genomes, we further demonstrate that different strains co-colonizing the GI tract of the same patient can reside in multiple putative transmission clusters, revealing potential transmission links that clone-based approaches are likely to miss. These findings demonstrate the potential utility of culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing for higher-resolution hospital surveillance of bacterial transmission. Applying this approach to other bacterial pathogens could improve our ability to detect and interpret transmission involving heterogeneous microbial populations that colonize and infect hospitalized patients. Data SummaryPatient demographic data and clinical characteristics can be found in Table S1 (online Supplementary Material). All sequencing data generated in this study has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject PRJNA901969, with sample accession numbers listed in Table S2. Sequences used to construct the local reference strain database are available at NCBI BioProject PRJNA475751, with accession numbers listed in Table S3. Variants identified in single-strain blood and GI populations are listed in Table S4. Accession numbers for clinical isolate genomes included in transmission analyses are listed in Table S5. RepositoriesSequencing data generated in this study is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject PRJNA901969.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.9%
2
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.2%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
5
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
11
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
15
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
18
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
19
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%