Back

Randomised controlled trial of social prescribing in schools to reduce loneliness in pupils (INACT): Trial study protocol

Hayes, D.; Booth, R. J.; Bu, F.; Humphrey, N.; Qualter, P.; Sticpewich, L.; Bone, J. K.; Stuttard, H.; Ellis, S.; Maguire, S.; Umpierrez, L. C. G.; Stapley, E.; Tibber, M.; Fancourt, D.

2026-03-13 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.11.26347953 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSocial prescribing (SP) connects individuals with sources of support within their local communities and has been shown to improve loneliness. However, uptake from young people (YP) has been lower than for adults, in part due to them not accessing SP in primary care where it has been predominantly based. The INACT (INcreasing AdolesCent social and community support) programme is a novel, co-produced, SP pathway via schools for YP to access community assets and support. MethodsThis trial utilises a two-group (intervention vs. active control) parallel randomised design, with YP as the unit of randomisation. A minimum of 215 YP will be recruited across approximately 30 mainstream schools (primary and secondary) in England. YP reporting high levels of loneliness (7 or above on the Good Childhood index) will be randomly allocated to receive either SP or signposting. SP will consist of 6-12 sessions with a Link Worker who will work with individuals, on a one-to-one basis, to understand what matters to them and connect them with local sources of support, whilst pupils in the signposting arm will receive a leaflet from a school staff member detailing the same sources of support. YP will be followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment allocation. Secondary outcome measures include wellbeing, emotional difficulties, service use, health related quality of life, stress, emotional regulation, as well as intervention feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. Data about health-related quality of life and service use will be used to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the INACT programme. DiscussionThis trial will provide robust evidence about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the INACT programme and whether it can be recommended for use in practice. The trial is due to finish 30 June 2027.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
29.4%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
5
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
9
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%