Back

Mineralized collagen scaffold pore architecture and glycosaminoglycan content biases anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype

Kolliopoulos, V.; Vidana Gamage, H.; Polanek, M.; Wong Yan Ling, M.; Lin, A.; Guldberg, R.; Nelson, E. R.; Spiller, K.; Harley, B.

2026-03-12 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.10.710810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macrophages play a central role in early immune response after injury that can shape the success or failure of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone repair. While mineralized collagen glycosaminoglycan (GAG) scaffolds have been developed to support osteogenesis, here we define how scaffold pore size, pore alignment, and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) composition influence human monocyte-derived macrophage polarization. We establish flow cytometry, secretome, and gene expression benchmarks to assess primary macrophage polarization toward M1 versus M2 phenotypes in response to cytokine cocktails in 2D culture and 3D scaffolds. We then define the kinetics macrophage polarization in response to scaffold pore architecture and composition in the absence of exogenous cytokines. All scaffold variants support an early pro-inflammatory response followed by a shift toward M2-like phenotypes over seven days reflected by increased CD206 expression, secretion of pro-healing factors such as CCL18, and upregulation of M2a- and M2c-associated genes. Anisotropic scaffolds with smaller pores more robustly drove angiogenic and extracellular matrix related gene expression as well as earlier emergence of M2-like phenotypes. Scaffold GAG chemistry provided an additional tuning mechanism, with chondroitin-6-sulfate variants promoting the greatest late-stage M2 surface marker expression, heparin variants accelerating early M2 and pro-angiogenic phenotypes, and chondroitin-4-sulfate variants dampening both M1 and M2 phenotypes at early timepoints. These findings demonstrate that mineralized collagen scaffolds intrinsically guide macrophage polarization toward pro-regenerative states but that scaffold structure and composition can be used to shape the kinetics and intensity of these responses. These insights provide a critical foundation for immuno-instructive biomaterial designs that enhance CMF bone repair.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
9
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
11
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
13
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%