Back

Benchmarking zero-shot single-cell foundation model embeddings for cellular dynamics reconstruction

Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.; Ling, Y.; Tian, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, P.; Chen, L.

2026-03-12 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.10.710748 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reconstructing cellular trajectories from time-resolved single-cell transcriptomics is fundamental to understanding processes from embryonic development to cancer progression. While single-cell foundation models (scFMs) promise universal biological representations through large-scale pretraining, their capacity to capture the non-linear dynamics governing cell-fate decisions remains uncharacterized. Here we systematically benchmark multiple scFMs across challenging biomedical scenarios involving branching lineages and continuous state transitions. By coupling zero-shot scFM embeddings with dynamic optimal transport, we evaluated their performance against a traditional highly variable gene (HVG) baseline in backtracking progenitor states, interpolating transition intermediates, and extrapolating future fates. We find that zero-shot scFM embeddings underperform the HVG baseline across diverse biological systems, particularly in recovering the distributional complexity of unobserved cells. Mechanistic analysis reveals that current scFM architectures tend to over-compress subtle temporal signals, causing an artificial "linearization" of branched biological structures that may obscure critical divergence points in disease progression. Our findings suggest that while scFMs provide unified cell-state views, the HVG baseline remains more robust for trajectory inference, identifying a fundamental "temporal-compression" bottleneck that must be addressed to develop next-generation, dynamics-aware foundation models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.