Back

A novel mechanism of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated by L2 β-lactamase

Garai, P.; Nozick, S.; Jozefczyk, C. C.; Nam, H.; O?Donnell, J. N.; Ozer, E. A.; Hauser, A. R.; Rhodes, N. J.

2026-03-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.10.710737 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The prevalance of non-susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains low but novel mechanisms of C/T resistance are of concern. Herein, we describe a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotype associated with high-level C/T resistance (>256/4 {micro}g/mL) in a single patient. Whole genome sequencing of the isolate was compared to that of a susceptible isolate cultured from the same patient two months earlier. Analysis of the sequences revealed two different P. aeruginosa high-risk clones: ST111 followed by ST235. The C/T-resistant ST235 isolate contained five copies of a genetic element comprised of an L2 {beta}-lactamase gene (blaL2) and a truncated ampRL2 transcriptional regulator gene, which are commonly found together in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains and have not been reported to mediate resistance to C/T. Comparative genomic analysis with other P. aeruginosa isolates failed to identify alternative explanations for the observed C/T resistance. We found that exogenous expression of blaL2 modestly increased C/T MICs in genetically distinct P. aeruginosa strains. A screen of our archived isolates identified two P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, PS2045 and PS2046, with one and two copies, respectively, of the genetic element containing blaL2 and truncated ampRL2. Interestingly, disruption of the gene blaL2 but not the truncated ampRL2 in PS2045 led to a significant decrease in C/T MIC. Thus, we report a novel mechanism of C/T resistance in P. aeruginosa mediated by an L2 {beta}-lactamase independently of its canonical regulator AmpRL2.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
36.9%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
6
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
7
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
9
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
13
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%